Comments on: Right Wing Lunatic Michelle Malkin Banned From McCain Conference Calls

By: Timothy Singleton

Timothy Singleton — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:04:46 +0000

The cool thing about all this is, nature and reality will impose punishment on the democrats and liberals sooner or later because no matter big a fit you pitch about your supposed rights to this and that, if ain' t nobody willing to go the distance to be a good doctor because you are unwilling to reward merit in this country, you will deprive everyone of decent medical care.

You do NOT have a right to the following:
*healthcare
*owning a home
*a bigger share of the economy than you produce through your brains and brawn.

…and Michelle Malkin IS hotter than your candidates, Bob, on both sides. LOL.

Progressive taxation is THEFT, is stealing, is robbery and all the BS pontification and twistings and sophistries by people who are unwilling to do what others do in order to get there, actions takes with NO guarantees as to success, all their whining and pi$$ing and moaning will not change the essential nature of the theft.

By: Timothy Singleton

Timothy Singleton — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:04:18 +0000

This is to hello. I make a higher income than most, a lower income than a lot. I earn it because I made it a point to know what I need to know in order to do my job. I made it a point to master the knowledge, to be there everyday, to not abuse my sick days, to always say, "Okay, boss," when I was asked to do something, to volunteer for the jobs that I KNEW no one else wanted to do. My higher income is a matter of merit. You can demand all you want to place higher taxes on me; perhaps you will succeed. Guess what happens then? I will only do the same amount of work as others which will cause productivity to go down. Dummycrats do not understand that you cannot legislate the effort an individual is willing to put forth nor can you legislate the fortunes of men. You can tax them into indifference, though.

By: bob

bob — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:02:32 +0000

Your all Tools to the Reserve. I actually chuckled, (that word doesn't get used that much anymore) at the level of hateful emotion that both sides of this "debate" are using. YOU ARE BOTH TOOLS. BOTH parties, since the mid eighteenth century have been at it for their own gain. Ron Paul is not that much better, the "allowable" third party candidate.that will never do jack sh*t. He is a pressure relief valve for people that actually start to wake up.

Fourteen weeks ago, WOW the spin engines have spun down I guess???

"My candidates are bigger then your candidates" "My candidates are smarter/sexier/more conservative/more fair/sharing/concerned then your candidates!"

Do unto others, waiting for 2012, that has nothing to do with The Bible. Yes capitalized.

PS You're still ALL TOOLS

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:43:49 +0000

The option of "riding this out" isn't a reality bud. In fact if Obama were to do nothing, we would literally watch as the bottom fell completely out of our markets (if you think its bad now, multiply it by 10 and that's a glimpse of what we would see a year from now with no action taken.) Luckily we have a Democrat in office, who as Dems have done many times before, is much better equipped to deal with any economic issue.

(PLEASE TAKE A LOOK IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE FOR YOURSELF) http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3563/3386475066_1c...

In closing I also want to go ahead and say that I am pegging you as a Ron Paul supporter. I could be wrong — but I doubt it. Your lack of understanding in regards to the market in general as well as your non-existent grasp on reality leads me to strongly believe you are in fact a Paul-tard.

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:38:07 +0000

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:31:06 +0000

You are clearly insane. I mean I really don't know of any other way to put it. It always amazes me how the far right –notice I didn't say all Republican's– throw around the phrases like "Marxist", "Communist" and "Socialist" while you clearly (this is evident in the manner in which you are using the terms) have no real idea what any of them truly mean.

Your statement claiming to be in the lower middle class bracket and not wanting to the Soros' and Streisand's to be taxed more highlights how little you understand how this country works, and what in fact would happen if the top 5% were taxed at the same rate as the rest of the country. Well, that is, nowadays – where the separation of wealth between the rich and the poor is larger then any other period in American history.

I said it before and I will say it again — You are not worth the energy. You're painfully ignorant and debating you draws parallels to watching a TV that is not turned on — pointless.

My advice to you is learn some American history, as well as learn what "Marxist", "Communist" and "Socialist" leaders in real life, enacted when in power. Do some research, and no, research does not include foaming at the mouth 3 hours a day listening to Hannity and Limbaugh as you pleasure yourself.

The economy under Bush's guidance was for lack of a better term — demolished. After shedding 1.2 million jobs this year (before Obama stepped foot in the White House as President elect), unemployment jumped to 6.5%, the highest level in 14 years. The number of Americans receiving long-term jobless benefits catapulted to a 25 year high while U.S. manufacturing output plummeted to a 26 year low. Home foreclosures skyrocketed by 71% in the third quarter. Devastated by the credit crunch, the American auto industry teeters on the brink of collapse; GM lost $2.5 billion last quarter and could run out of cash next year. In that same quarter, U.S. GDP slumped by 0.3%. It's no wonder that consumer confidence spiraled to its lowest level on record.

By: hello

hello — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:32:17 +0000

If people who have higher incomes earned that income through their own hard work, and anyone who made less than them hadn’t worked as hard, then arguing that a progressive tax rate was theft would have some merit. Unfortunately, we don’t live in your conservative fantasy world.

By: Tim Singleton

Tim Singleton — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:35:04 +0000

Part Three to Matt

I cannot express my rage and frustration over the betrayal I felt with the passage of the Patriot Act nor why we invaded IRAQ when Bin Laden was in AFHGANISTAN. Junior was putting paid to an old grudge between Iraq's president and his dad.

…and Americans, like dogs, turned their rears into the air for a good punching squalling all the time, "Protect me! Protect me! Protect my right to borrow too much!" Cretins, all of us.

Now, we turn to Gore to save us from nothing but a fairy tale and we turn to Obama to save us from the evils of too much borrowing. How's he going to do it? By borrowing more.

This entire fubared situation is caused by the simple weakness and greed of Americans who refuse to be responsible for themselves and to live within their means. Gloming onto Marxism, no matter how many bows you put on it, is only going to drive us into further loss of rights and economic ruin.

You, buddy, are WORTH the time it took to type this. I am sorry you feel others are not.

-Tim

By: Tim Singleton

Tim Singleton — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:34:19 +0000

Part Two to Matt

Obama is a Marxist who believe in taxing the successful more than the poor. This is nothing but THEFT, regardless of what you want to call it. I am in the lower echelon of the middle class and I would no more impose a larger tax percentage wise on Soros and Streisand than I would steal from my neighbor's home.

The dollar's value continues to go up because the entire planet is terrified of tha alternative. The market bounces back and forth on even the silliest comments or announcements on the news, ignoring the underlying circumstances. Bush's shortcomings…and they are MANY….have nothing to do with my abject horror of the principles that the Three Marxisteers stand for because Bush WAS NOT A CONSERVATIVE. He was a neo-conservative and that is damn near a Fascist group with the way they have swapout bum bump with each other over the last eight years.

By: Tim Singleton

Tim Singleton — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:33:16 +0000

"These are just a few, and if I didn't see you as nothing more then a colossal waste of time I would keep on going — but you are not worth it. You have chosen to cover your eyes and ears to reality, instead opting to use some of the more elementary level ad hominem attacks on Obama that I have across to date."

Isn't this a sad statement? See, Matt, I think YOU are worth the effort simply by virtue of the fact that you are a human being.