Right Wing Lunatic Michelle Malkin Banned From McCain Conference Calls
May 18, 2008
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Well, well, well, it looks that everyone’s favorite gas bag, Michelle Malkin is crying because Senator John McCain and his staff have refused to invite her to take part in his weekly confrerence calls with conservative bloggers.
If you have ever read any of Malkin’s hate spewing garbage then you can imagine the whining bellowed from her web site. Here is a portion of the story in which Malkin starts the feet stomping, temper tantrum regarding her “inability” to take part in the said conference calls:
“The McCain campaign holds weekly blogger conference calls with its candidate. There are many questions I know you’d like asked, but I’ve never been able to ask them because I haven’t been one of the privileged few conservative bloggers allowed into the McCain sanctum to ask those questions for you.”
There are a handful of different reasons circulating as too why the McCain camp would rather have Malkin “shut out” of the process. Out of all these so-called reasons, I would have to say that Tbogg’s has the best argument as too what the most likely culprit behind the blacklisting of Malkin is. Below you will see the video evidence, clearly illustrating why Michelle is pretty much loathed by any level headed, rational human being, which include those sending the invitations to bloggers for McCain’s conference calls:
- Can You Blame McCain for not Wanting Malkin Involved? Watch This & you Won’t:
Case closed. Not only is she a radical ideologue whose ideas would place America back in the 17th century, but she is a heinous cheerleader, with a voice that makes you want to either smash your face into a brick wall, or jump out of an airplane without a parachute.
- Fashionistas: Michelle Obama meets Carla Bruni Michelle Obama, whom French fashionistas regard as the best-dressed...
- Right-wing ‘lies’ force Obama adviser out The White House environmental adviser Van Jones, a towering...
- John Stewart Discusses the Right Wing Media’s Outrage Over Wanda Sykes Comments, Yet Still Defend Torture The mass hysteria from the right rolled in overnight,...
Malkin is the creepiest thing since Coulter.
Just finished watching her and the pretend protesters paid to create some images meant to smear anyone who protests by linking them to kooky looking characters. The failure of that wasn’t nearly as entertaining as seeing Malkin confronted by a reporter who’d previously interviewed her who then proceeded to spell out her lies till she ran away. Hilarious seeing her on the receiving end for a change.
Never heard of her before, but it didn’t seem mean. The only mean things were your post.
[...] http://hyerstandard.com/right-wing-lunatic-michelle-malkin-banned-from-mccain-conference-calls/ “Well, well, well, it looks that everyone’s favorite gas bag, Michelle Malkin is crying because Senator John McCain and his staff have refused to invite her to take part in his weekly conference calls with conservative bloggers.” I note the banner “Where Everything’s Elegant and Relevant” A frustrated interior designer no doubt, that could not make the grade at Home Depot’s home improvement department? To continue: “If you have ever read any of Malkin’s hate spewing garbage then you can imagine the whining bellowed from her web site. Here is a portion of the story in which Malkin starts the feet stomping, temper tantrum…..Below you will see the video evidence, clearly illustrating why Michelle is pretty much loathed by any level headed, rational human being…” [...]
Maybe it has to do with this quote from McCain:
“I hate the gooks,” McCain said yesterday in response to a question from reporters aboard his campaign bus. “I will hate them as long as I live.”
So what has Michelle Malkin “lied” about? What is this “hate spewing garbage” she has ever written or said? She’s just a columnist, not one of the typical anti-American types you usually find in that field, mind you, but a valid journalist who just examines issues from an angle you just might not be used to. So are we now silencing media in this country, where supposedly there is freedom of speech?
She’s sexy as hell too, by the way, all leftists are inheritely ugly people on the inside and it finds its way to the outside in most cases! You poor bitter poeple!
Glass houses, HyerStandard.
“She’s sexy as hell?” Apparently all Noel is concerned with is if he can get in her pants. Personally I’m a pretty compassionate, good hearted person myself who leans to the left and I am quite sexy, thanks for asking. While I don’t know who Michelle Malkin is other than a rightest pundit, I think that it’s quite obvious that McCain doesn’t like Asian people which makes him a racist. After all, he was the one who decided to run over to Vietnam and bomb people in their homes to make Goodyear and Mobil happy and personally I can’t blame them for shooting him down and beating his ass. After all they were merely at home having dinner and living life when he came along to blow them to hell and back. It’s also quite obvious that Michelle is Asian. She definitely isn’t an Anglo Saxon which makes me wonder why she even wants to crawl up McCain’s ass in the first place. I think the remark he made about “gooks” should repulse her but I guess you’ll always find a Black person at a KKK meeting looking from the outside in and wanting to be part of the party and I guess you’ll find a sexy Asian woman wanting to crawl up the ass of an Asian hating politician because she wants to be a Republican like the big boys. Which leads me to ask if someone who hates any segment of American society should even be nominated President? If you can’t accept everyone who makes up this country of ours then don’t run for office and hate “gooks” on your own dime, aight?
She is a “Radical Ideologue”, and a “Lunatic” …but you’ll all be lining up to vote for the second coming of Mao come election day. You leftist scumbags are so full of hate it almost overshadows your stupidity.
If you are all part of the great party of compassion and enlightement, how come the best you can do is throw childish insults at anyone who doesn’t own a little Red Book. It will be fun watching your country burn.
I’m not sure who’s responsible for writing this crap, but the next time you decide to reveal your ignorance of the political landscape, please at least take the effort to check for grammatical errors. I mean seriously, I was willing to assume that the first misuse of the word “too” was an accident, but then you followed it up with a second misuse in the very next sentence. Are you a retard? Hypothetical question… you’re clearly a retard.
I wanted to waste some time illustrating why you’re so far off base with your liberal thinking, but then I remembered the quote that “for those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible.” Since you don’t get it, I’m clearly not going to enlighten you here. So, for my closing remark I will simply say, get your head out of your ass!
P.S. – Your web banner smacks of Soviet agitprop. I hope that you won’t miss your freedom if Obama is elected… you communist douche
Congratulations on Obama’s victory. I’ll bet your looking forward to your tax cut. Surely the evil corporations that supply our gasoline, food, medical supplies and such will get what they deserve with their tax increase. To bad they will just pass it on to us. By the way, your tax cut is no more than a welfare check. Wouldn’t it be better to stop your whining and make yourself qualified for a real job? Maybe start your own business? I guess the self-sufficient people owe you worthless cancers on society what they earn. Right, your victims of society…(or stupidity?). By the way, pull your pants up, you look like a prison bitch.
Michelle Malkin is the kind of woman I like. Speaks her mind, Republican and sexier than 99% of the democrats. Of course, dykes are not all that attractive so there never was any competition for Michelle in that respect.
Let’s just wait and see the change now. LOL just like Jimmy Carter changed things Obama will now. He will be a one termer. In four years the ones who voted for Obama would vote for Goofy if that cartoon character would run just to get Obama out and to stop making all those “changes” that we need. LOL HE he HA ha.
Michelle Malkin is the bomb in my opinion. I read her blogs regularly and agree with her on many issues.
In case that is not clear…it means I oppose this Pretender to the Poor, Obama, on every thing he stands for.
BTW, you having fun yet? As everything Obama gets passed FAILS? I know I am. Perhaps with his, Reids (who thinks voters stink) and Pelosi's (woman wants to tax MY 401(K) to provide benefits for illegals) failure, we can finally start moving the US back towards a representative republic and not this bs welfare state with pretensions of democracy that we have now.
What exactly has failed? He has been in office how long? You Republicans make me laugh, and I am being totally serious here. You morons did more then your fair share (Republicans are not the sole reason, but a nice sized majority of it) to bring this economy to it's knees.
There has been a lot of whining and complaining by Republicans and conservatives about how Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama wants to steal from you and "redistribute the wealth" and turn this former Constitutional republic into a Socialist country.
Here are a handful of ways your know nothing party made this a "Socialist state", all before Obama was even close to president elect I might add.
1. Our American manufacturing and technology jobs have spread to Asia, Indonesia, and Mexico.
2. Our taxes and the blood of our own offspring have been spread all over the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan, with plans to do it again in Iran, Syria, North Korea, and so on.
3. Our formerly living wages have been sent overseas with our jobs or depressed beyond recognition by the hiring of millions of illegal immigrants who will work for almost nothing.
4. Our savings and retirement accounts have been destroyed and given to the same people on Wall Street who are now profiting from the short market and bailouts.
5. Our involuntary taxes continue to be spread to other countries in the name of "foreign aid" even though we cannot afford to feed our own people.
6. Our health care costs now exceed our ability to pay for it, yet millions of illegal immigrants and other people who don't pay into the system get free or cut-rate medical care.
7. Our income has been given to oil companies, who continue to report record profits at our expense while still receiving corporate welfare subsidies.
8. Our childrens financial future has already been mortgaged and given to wealthy individuals and grossly inefficient corporations, through an unpopular and unwanted Congressional bailout. Note that the bailouts resulted in the government acquiring private corporations, which is the very definition of Socialism.
9. Our money is devalued daily by the Federal Reserve, where the printing presses run continually with nothing to back it except the wages of average Americans, and which is owned almost entirely by private foreign banking corporations
10. The money that is "loaned" to the government by the private foreign banks results in new debt, which means that the interest payments that must be paid come straight out of the pockets of the American people in form of increasingly higher taxes.
Back to the economy. You want to criticize Democrats in regards to the shit show our economy is right now? You must be out of your mind my friend. Here are just a couple of (and believe you me, there are a lot more then this) instances in which your boytoy – Bush – and the right wing of our government hurt the U.S. so severely:
—> Bush encouraged the overstretching of credit and helped create the housing bubble by his constant preaching of the concept of the "ownership society." Basically the dirt-cheap credit that was supposed to help the economy recover from the shock of 9/11 and subsequent wars created a home-buying boom, and Bush saw that this was helping the economy, so he jumped on board and tried to score politically off of it by claiming the "ownership society" as his. However, naturally, homes became more and more expensive as people rushed to buy, exotic types of credit were invented in the absence of banking regulations, and the situation we know today developed.
—> He invaded Iraq which put an incredible amount of strain on an all-ready over inflated budget and destabilized the Middle East, creating a War-Premium on oil. (What the hell happened to the "war will pay for itself" plan? You right wingers seem to forget lie after lie, failure after failure, your party served the country.)
—> The war in Iraq has cost the United States over 1 trillion dollars. To pay for said war George Bush, along with the federal reserve, has printed off money and taken loans from China. This has flooded the market with US dollars thus creating inflation. You don't have to know much about economics to know that inflation is bad — but I wouldn't expect you ingrates to take this into account either.
—> The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001. Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000—more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American. The inequities were compounded by a second tax cut, in 2003, this one skewed even more heavily toward the rich. Together these tax cuts, when fully implemented and if made permanent, mean that in 2012 the average reduction for an American in the bottom 20 percent will be a scant $45, while those with incomes of more than $1 million will see their tax bills reduced by an average of $162,000.
—> In breathtaking disregard for the most basic rules of fiscal propriety, the administration continued to cut taxes even as it undertook expensive new spending programs and embarked on a financially ruinous “war of choice” in Iraq. A budget surplus of 2.4 percent of gross domestic product (G.D.P.), which greeted Bush as he took office, turned into a deficit of 3.6 percent in the space of four years. The United States had not experienced a turnaround of this magnitude since the global crisis of World War II.
These are just a few, and if I didn't see you as nothing more then a colossal waste of time I would keep on going — but you are not worth it. You have chosen to cover your eyes and ears to reality, instead opting to use some of the more elementary level ad hominem attacks on Obama that I have across to date.
"These are just a few, and if I didn't see you as nothing more then a colossal waste of time I would keep on going — but you are not worth it. You have chosen to cover your eyes and ears to reality, instead opting to use some of the more elementary level ad hominem attacks on Obama that I have across to date."
Isn't this a sad statement? See, Matt, I think YOU are worth the effort simply by virtue of the fact that you are a human being.
Part Two to Matt
Obama is a Marxist who believe in taxing the successful more than the poor. This is nothing but THEFT, regardless of what you want to call it. I am in the lower echelon of the middle class and I would no more impose a larger tax percentage wise on Soros and Streisand than I would steal from my neighbor's home.
The dollar's value continues to go up because the entire planet is terrified of tha alternative. The market bounces back and forth on even the silliest comments or announcements on the news, ignoring the underlying circumstances. Bush's shortcomings…and they are MANY….have nothing to do with my abject horror of the principles that the Three Marxisteers stand for because Bush WAS NOT A CONSERVATIVE. He was a neo-conservative and that is damn near a Fascist group with the way they have swapout bum bump with each other over the last eight years.
Part Three to Matt
I cannot express my rage and frustration over the betrayal I felt with the passage of the Patriot Act nor why we invaded IRAQ when Bin Laden was in AFHGANISTAN. Junior was putting paid to an old grudge between Iraq's president and his dad.
…and Americans, like dogs, turned their rears into the air for a good punching squalling all the time, "Protect me! Protect me! Protect my right to borrow too much!" Cretins, all of us.
Now, we turn to Gore to save us from nothing but a fairy tale and we turn to Obama to save us from the evils of too much borrowing. How's he going to do it? By borrowing more.
This entire fubared situation is caused by the simple weakness and greed of Americans who refuse to be responsible for themselves and to live within their means. Gloming onto Marxism, no matter how many bows you put on it, is only going to drive us into further loss of rights and economic ruin.
You, buddy, are WORTH the time it took to type this. I am sorry you feel others are not.
-Tim
If people who have higher incomes earned that income through their own hard work, and anyone who made less than them hadn’t worked as hard, then arguing that a progressive tax rate was theft would have some merit. Unfortunately, we don’t live in your conservative fantasy world.
You are clearly insane. I mean I really don't know of any other way to put it. It always amazes me how the far right –notice I didn't say all Republican's– throw around the phrases like "Marxist", "Communist" and "Socialist" while you clearly (this is evident in the manner in which you are using the terms) have no real idea what any of them truly mean.
Your statement claiming to be in the lower middle class bracket and not wanting to the Soros' and Streisand's to be taxed more highlights how little you understand how this country works, and what in fact would happen if the top 5% were taxed at the same rate as the rest of the country. Well, that is, nowadays – where the separation of wealth between the rich and the poor is larger then any other period in American history.
I said it before and I will say it again — You are not worth the energy. You're painfully ignorant and debating you draws parallels to watching a TV that is not turned on — pointless.
My advice to you is learn some American history, as well as learn what "Marxist", "Communist" and "Socialist" leaders in real life, enacted when in power. Do some research, and no, research does not include foaming at the mouth 3 hours a day listening to Hannity and Limbaugh as you pleasure yourself.
The economy under Bush's guidance was for lack of a better term — demolished. After shedding 1.2 million jobs this year (before Obama stepped foot in the White House as President elect), unemployment jumped to 6.5%, the highest level in 14 years. The number of Americans receiving long-term jobless benefits catapulted to a 25 year high while U.S. manufacturing output plummeted to a 26 year low. Home foreclosures skyrocketed by 71% in the third quarter. Devastated by the credit crunch, the American auto industry teeters on the brink of collapse; GM lost $2.5 billion last quarter and could run out of cash next year. In that same quarter, U.S. GDP slumped by 0.3%. It's no wonder that consumer confidence spiraled to its lowest level on record.
The option of "riding this out" isn't a reality bud. In fact if Obama were to do nothing, we would literally watch as the bottom fell completely out of our markets (if you think its bad now, multiply it by 10 and that's a glimpse of what we would see a year from now with no action taken.) Luckily we have a Democrat in office, who as Dems have done many times before, is much better equipped to deal with any economic issue.
<center><IMG Src ="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3563/3386475066_1c886a4bff.jpg"></center>
In closing I also want to go ahead and say that I am pegging you as a Ron Paul supporter. I could be wrong — but I doubt it. Your lack of understanding in regards to the market in general as well as your non-existent grasp on reality leads me to strongly believe you are in fact a Paul-tard.
The option of "riding this out" isn't a reality bud. In fact if Obama were to do nothing, we would literally watch as the bottom fell completely out of our markets (if you think its bad now, multiply it by 10 and that's a glimpse of what we would see a year from now with no action taken.) Luckily we have a Democrat in office, who as Dems have done many times before, is much better equipped to deal with any economic issue.
(PLEASE TAKE A LOOK IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE FOR YOURSELF) http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3563/3386475066_1c...
In closing I also want to go ahead and say that I am pegging you as a Ron Paul supporter. I could be wrong — but I doubt it. Your lack of understanding in regards to the market in general as well as your non-existent grasp on reality leads me to strongly believe you are in fact a Paul-tard.
Your all Tools to the Reserve. I actually chuckled, (that word doesn't get used that much anymore) at the level of hateful emotion that both sides of this "debate" are using. YOU ARE BOTH TOOLS. BOTH parties, since the mid eighteenth century have been at it for their own gain. Ron Paul is not that much better, the "allowable" third party candidate.that will never do jack sh*t. He is a pressure relief valve for people that actually start to wake up.
Fourteen weeks ago, WOW the spin engines have spun down I guess???
"My candidates are bigger then your candidates" "My candidates are smarter/sexier/more conservative/more fair/sharing/concerned then your candidates!"
Do unto others, waiting for 2012, that has nothing to do with The Bible. Yes capitalized.
PS You're still ALL TOOLS
This is to hello. I make a higher income than most, a lower income than a lot. I earn it because I made it a point to know what I need to know in order to do my job. I made it a point to master the knowledge, to be there everyday, to not abuse my sick days, to always say, "Okay, boss," when I was asked to do something, to volunteer for the jobs that I KNEW no one else wanted to do. My higher income is a matter of merit. You can demand all you want to place higher taxes on me; perhaps you will succeed. Guess what happens then? I will only do the same amount of work as others which will cause productivity to go down. Dummycrats do not understand that you cannot legislate the effort an individual is willing to put forth nor can you legislate the fortunes of men. You can tax them into indifference, though.
The cool thing about all this is, nature and reality will impose punishment on the democrats and liberals sooner or later because no matter big a fit you pitch about your supposed rights to this and that, if ain' t nobody willing to go the distance to be a good doctor because you are unwilling to reward merit in this country, you will deprive everyone of decent medical care.
You do NOT have a right to the following:
*healthcare
*owning a home
*a bigger share of the economy than you produce through your brains and brawn.
…and Michelle Malkin IS hotter than your candidates, Bob, on both sides. LOL.
Progressive taxation is THEFT, is stealing, is robbery and all the BS pontification and twistings and sophistries by people who are unwilling to do what others do in order to get there, actions takes with NO guarantees as to success, all their whining and pi$$ing and moaning will not change the essential nature of the theft.